Финляндия по-русски - Самые экологически грязненые места

Meha

27-10-2006, 13:04

Международная Организация Блацсмитх Институте опубликовала список самых экологически загрязненых мест на планете.
хттп://щщщ.смитхинституте.орг/топ10/топ10мап3.йпг
Страны бывшего СССР заняли много почетных мест в этом списке:
ЧЕРНОБЫЛ, УКРАИНЕ
ДЗЕРЗИНСК, РУССИА
КОЛА ПЕНИНСУЛА, РУССИА
КОМИ, РУССИА
МАГНИТОГОРСК, РУССИА
МАИЛУУ-СУУ, КЫРГЫЗСТАН
МАЯК анд Лаке Карачаы, ЧЕЛЯБИНСК Руссиа
НОРИЛСК, РУССИА
РУДНАЯ ПРИСТАН/ДАЛНЕГОРСК, РУССИА
СУМГАЫИТ, АЗЕРБАИЯН
ВОЛГОГРАД, РУССИА
хттп://щщщ.смитхинституте.орг/топ10/щорст35д.хтмлъс28

Полный репорт с картинками здесь (не для слабонервных) 12 Метров хттп://щщщ.смитхинституте.орг/топ10/10щорст1.пдф
А здесь отчет без картинок хттп://щщщ.смитхинституте.орг/топ10/10щорст1.пдф
а огласите весь списочек, пожалуиста

Suriken

27-10-2006, 13:08

У меня не заходит на сайт.
Уж и зарегистрировался. Показывает, что залогинен, но ничего больше не показывает.

Elki-Palki

27-10-2006, 13:14

Вот ссылочка, по ней побродите, все сами увидите
http://www.smithinstitute.org
Ё!

Meha

27-10-2006, 13:15

Вот ссылочка, по ней побродите, все сами увидите
хттп://щщщ.смитхинституте.орг
Ё!
издиваетесь?!
а без регистрации никак нельзя?!!!

Suriken

27-10-2006, 13:18

Вот ссылочка, по ней побродите, все сами увидите
http://www.smithinstitute.org
Ё!
Ну и долго там бродить? Это пресс-релизы или куда?

o.k.

27-10-2006, 13:24

Я там ничего не понимаю, опять всё на анлийском. Здесь, что все прям владеют им?

MihaNik

27-10-2006, 13:30

Международная Организация Blacsmith Institute опубликовала список самых экологически загрязненых мест на планете.
http://www.smithinstitute.org/top10/top10map3.jpg
Страны бывшего СССР заняли много почетных мест в этом списке:
CHERNOBYL, UKRAINE
DZERZINSK, RUSSIA
KOLA PENINSULA, RUSSIA
KOMI, RUSSIA
MAGNITOGORSK, RUSSIA
MAILUU-SUU, KYRGYZSTAN
MAYAK and Lake Karachay, CHELYABINSK Russia
NORILSK, RUSSIA
RUDNAYA PRISTAN/DALNEGORSK, RUSSIA
SUMGAYIT, AZERBAIJAN
VOLGOGRAD, RUSSIA
http://www.smithinstitute.org/top10/worst35d.html#s28

Полный репорт с картинками здесь (не для слабонервных) 12 Метров http://www.smithinstitute.org/top10/10worst1.pdf
А здесь отчет без картинок http://www.smithinstitute.org/top10/10worst1.pdf

интересно ,по каким критериям велась оценка ?
или они просто прокатились по б.союзу и нафоткали помоек? так это старая тема

Elki-Palki

27-10-2006, 14:42

интересно ,по каким критериям велась оценка ?
или они просто прокатились по б.союзу и нафоткали помоек? так это старая тема
Тема была опубликована три дня назад.
Интересно знать как? - иди и читай.
Ё!

Suriken

27-10-2006, 14:44

Тема была опубликована три дня назад.
Интересно знать как? - иди и читай.
Ё!
Елки, выкладывай статью - почитаем. Не работает твой сайт.

Giomen

27-10-2006, 14:47

интересно ,по каким критериям велась оценка ?
или они просто прокатились по б.союзу и нафоткали помоек? так это старая тема

А че кататься и так все известно. Охотники за цветметом конечно внесли свою лепту в борьбе за экологию. Но на общую картину это мало повлияло :)

Elki-Palki

27-10-2006, 15:11

Что то они закрыли доступ.
Вот список:
Full List 2006

ANKLESHWAR, INDIA
ARJO, ETHIOPIA
BAIA MARE, ROMANIA
BAIE DE HANNE, SENEGAL
BHOPAL, INDIA
CHERNOBYL, UKRAINE
COPSA MICA, ROMANIA
CUBATAO, BRAZIL
DZERZINSK, RUSSIA
HAINA, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
HANFORD, UNITED STATES
HUAI RIVER, CHINA
KABWE, ZAMBIA
KANPUR, INDIA
KOLA PENINSULA, RUSSIA
KOMI, RUSSIA
LA OROYA, PERU
LINFEN, SHANXI PROVINCE, CHINA
MAGNITOGORSK, RUSSIA
MAILUU-SUU, KYRGYZSTAN
MARILAO, PHILIPPINES
MAYAK and Lake Karachay, CHELYABINSK Russia
MEXICO CITY, MEXICO
MT. DIWALWAL, PHILIPPINES
NEW ORLEANS, UNITED STATES
NIGER DELTA, NIGERIA
NORILSK, RUSSIA
OMAI , GUYANA
PICNIC GARDENS, KOLKATA, INDIA
RANIPET, INDIA
RUDNAYA PRISTAN/DALNEGORSK, RUSSIA
SPOLANA, CZECH REPUBLIC
SUMGAYIT, AZERBAIJAN
VAPI, INDIA
VOLGOGRAD, RUSSIA

А тут избранное
DZERZINSK, RUSSIA

Potentially affected people: 300,000

Dzerzhinsk Factories

Type of pollutants: Chemicals and toxic byproducts from Cold War-era chemical weapons manufacturing, including Sarin, VX gas, lewisite - the poisonous effect of which is owed to its arsenic trioxide content, yperite (mustard gas), prussic acid, phosgene, dioxins and other persistent organic chemicals. Lead, from an additives manufacturer, now closed.

Site description: In Dzerzhinsk, a significant center of the Russian chemical manufacturing, the average life expectancy is 42 years for men and 47 for women. Until the end of the Cold War, the city was among Russia's principal production sites of chemical weapons. According to figures from Dzerzhinsk's environmental agency, from 1930-1998, almost 300,000 tons of chemical waste were improperly disposed of. Of this waste, around 190 separate chemicals were released into the groundwater. These chemicals have turned the water into a white sludge containing dioxins and high levels of phenol – an industrial chemical which can lead to acute poisoning and death. These levels are reportedly 17 million times the safe limit.

The city draws its drinking water from the same aquifers into which these old wastes and unused products were pumped. Now that many of these industries are no longer in operation, the local groundwater has risen, along with the water level in the canal. This rise in the canal's water level threatens to dump arsenic, mercury, lead and dioxins into the Oka river basin, a source of drinking water for the nearby city of Nizhny Novgorod.

Despite the heavy toll on the population’s health, a quarter of the city's 300,000 residents are still employed in factories that turn out toxic chemicals. According to a 2003 BBC report it is the young who are most vulnerable. In the local cemetery, there are a shocking number of graves of people below the age of 40. In 2003 it was reported that the death rate exceeded the birth rate by 2.6 times and it is easy to see why. The dioxins that get into the water as a by-product of chlorine production are reported to cause cancer even in minute doses.

Cleanup Activity: Following the support of a baseline research project in the area in 2004, smith, in cooperation with the local government, has funded the installation of water treatment systems in Pyra (population 4,000), and Gavirolvka, settlements whose groundwater is highly polluted, yet remains the sole source of drinking water. In addition, smith has funded the establishment of a steering committee led by a local NGO (DRONT) in cooperation with the Nizhniy Novgorod municipal government, to begin the design of a large-scale remediation and pollution mitigation plan for the entire affected area.

In 2004 the local government conducted an initial evaluation of the extent of the groundwater contamination in the city and reviewed subsequent engineering options to bring clean water in to Dzerzhinsk to replace use of the contaminated groundwater source in Gavrilovka and Pyra, two areas of the city

INFORMATION

* Dzerzhinsk Chemical Plant Workers Call for Better Pensions : FBIS-TAC-97-119 : 29 Apr 1997

* Russian Chemical Weapons Sites Undergo Foreign Inspection : FBIS-TAC-98-068 : 9 Mar 1998

M R. Edelstein. “EMPOWERING RUSSIAN AND AMERICAN NGOs TO ADDRESS ISSUES OF FUTURE SUSTAINABILITY” FINAL PROJECT REPORT. Ramapo College of New Jersey

(2005) http://phobos.ramapo.edu/facassem/edelsteinempoweringngos.html

“Dzerzhinksk” Global Security Organization.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/russia/dzerzhinsk_cbw.htm

Tim Samuals, “Russia’s Deadly Factories.” BBC News. March 7, 2003.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/correspondent/2821835.stm

Elki-Palki

27-10-2006, 15:12

NORILSK, RUSSIA

Potentially affected people: 134,000

Type of pollutants: Air pollution – particulates including Strontium-90, Caesium-137, Sulfur dioxide, heavy metals (nickel, copper, cobalt, lead, selenium), particulates, nitrogen and carbon oxides, phenols, hydrogen sulfide.

Site description: An industrial city founded in 1935 as a slave labor camp, the Siberian city of Norilsk, Russia is the northernmost major city of Russia and the second largest city (after Murmansk) above the Arctic Circle. According to the Mines and Communities website the city is considered one of the most polluted places in Russia - where the snow is , the air tastes of sulfur and the life expectancy for factory workers is 10 years below the Russian average. This city houses the world’s largest heavy metals smelting complex, and over 4 million tons annually of cadmium, copper, lead, nickel, arsenic, selenium and zinc are dispersed into the air. Mining and smelting operation started in the 1930s, and is the worlds largest nickel producer. Norilsk Nickel, a recently privatized firm, is one of Russia's leading producers of non-ferrous and platinum-group metals. It controls one-third of the world's nickel deposits and accounts for a substantial portion of the country's total production of nickel, cobalt, platinum, and palladium. It is also a major polluter, ranking first among Russian industrial enterprises in terms of air pollution.

Due to the geographic location, reports on ecological impacts and contamination are infrequent from this location. In 1999, a report found elevated copper and nickel concentrations in soils up to a 60 km radius. The city population has been affected by air quality in this region of smelters, where it has been shown over half of all samples exceed the maximum allowable concentrations for both copper and nickel. A report in 1995 indicated that high levels of respiratory diseases have been observed in children around this area, and that these are most likely related to the air pollution from the smelter activity. Investigations evaluating the presence of ear, nose and throat disease among schoolchildren revealed that children living near the copper plant were twice as likely to become ill than those living in further districts. Similarly, children living near the nickel plant were shown to become ill at a rate 1.5 times higher than children from further districts. Analysis also showed that problems during the last half of pregnancy as well as premature births were much more frequent in Norilsk than in the Taimyr and Kransnoyark regions. Furthermore, mortality from respiratory diseases is considerably higher than the average in Russia, which is 28/1000 or 15.8% of all deaths among children.

Since November 2001, Norilsk has been shut to foreigners, one of 90 "closed towns" in Russia where Soviet-levels of secrecy persist.

Cleanup Activity

Many groups, some supported by international donors, have tried to address the problems. In the 1980’s emission reductions were tried by building dust and gas removal facilities, and also electrostatic precipitators and liquid phase sulfur removals. These technologies aided in sulfate reduction, but studies proved that damage to forests and concentrations of metals remained a significant problem to date.

INFORMATION

S. M. Allen-Gil, J. Ford, B. K. Lasorsa, M. Monetti, et al. “Heavy metal contamination in the Taimyr Peninsula, Siberian Arctic”. The Science of the Total Environment 301 (2003) 119-138.

J. M. Blais, K. E. Duff, T.E. Laing, J.P. Smol. “Regional contamination in lakes from the Noril’sk region in Siberia, Russia”. Water Air Soil Pollut. (1999) 110 (3-4) 389-404.

O.N. Zubareva, L. N. Skripal’shchikova, N. V. Greshilova, and V. I. Kharuk. “Zoning of landscapes exposed to technogenic emissions from the Norilsk Mining and Smeltering works”. Russian Journal of Ecology (2003) 34 (6) 375-380.

B. A. Revich. “Public health and ambient air pollution in Arctic and Subarctic cities of Russia”. The Science of the Total Environment. (1995). 160/161 585-592.

Mines And Communities Website. “Hell on Earth.” April 18, 2003. http://www.minesandcommunities.org/Action/press139.htm

Elki-Palki

27-10-2006, 15:13

CHERNOBYL, UKRAINE

Potentially affected people: Initially 5.5 million, now disputed levels of effect.

Type of pollutants: Uranium, Plutonium, Radioactive Iodine, Cesium-137, Strontium, and other metals

Site description: The world's worst nuclear disaster took place on April 26, 1986, when testing in the Chernobyl power plant, 62 miles north of Kiev, triggered a fiery melt-down of the reactor's core. Thirty people were killed in the accident, 135,000 evacuated, and one hundred times more radiation than the atom bombs dropped over Hiroshima and Nagasaki was released. To this day, the 19-mile exclusion zone around the plant remains uninhabitable.

Within seven months, the reactor was buried in a concrete casing designed to absorb radiation and contain the remaining fuel. However, the sarcophagus was only meant to be a temporary solution and designed to last 20 or 30 years. A program to re-contain the site is underway.

One major reason for the concern is that though an enormous amount of radiation was released during the disaster, most of the radioactivity remained trapped within the plant itself. Some estimate that more than 100 tons of uranium and other radioactive products, such as plutonium, remain to be released if there is another accident. Chernobyl is also thought to contain some 2,000 tons of combustible materials. Leaks in the structure lead experts to fear that rainwater and fuel dust have formed a toxic liquid that may be contaminating the groundwater.

Thyroid cancer in children surrounding this area is a main health problem. Over 4000 thyroid cases had been diagnosed since 2002. Most of these cases have been attributed to elevated concentrations of radioiodine found in milk. It is hard to project lethal cancer rates and other health risks associated with this fallout. What is known is more than five million people currently inhabit the affected areas of Belarus, Russia, and Ukraine, which have all been classified as ‘contaminated’ with radionuclides due to the Chernobyl accident (above 37 kBq m-2 of 137Cs).

Furthermore, from 1992 to 2002 in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine more than 4000 cases of thyroid cancer were diagnosed among those who were children and adolescents at the time of the accident, the age group 0-14 years being most affected.

A recent WHO report has indicated that the impact on future generations from radioactivity is now quite low. However this report has been met with skepticism from local and international experts.

Cleanup Activity

Expert groups such have carried out work on health impacts, remediation effects, and socioeconomic status of the region surrounding Chernobyl. Plans for the 19-mile exclusion zone to be recovered for restricted industrial uses remain but an appropriate environmental impact assessment needs to be finished. Also, implementation of an integrated radioactive waste management program to ensure consistent management and facility capacity needs to be assessed before further development. Costs for remedial action can only be estimated, and experts have predicted these at hundreds of billions of dollars. To date, the costs of the cleanup have placed significant financial burdens on Belarus, Russian Federation, and Ukraine.

Note: Given its resounding infamy, despite the subsequent progress that has been made at this site, we felt Chernobyl must be included in this Top Ten list due to its residual environmental impact as well as its potential to further affect such an extensive region and population.

INFORMATION

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. “Chernobyl’s Legacy: Health, Environmental and Socio-Economic Impacts and recommendations to the governments of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine.” The Chernobyl Forum: 2003-2005. http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Booklets/Chernobyl/chernobyl.pdf

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. “Environmental consequences of the Chernobyl accident and their remediation: Twenty Years of Experience” Report of the Chernobyl Forum Expert Group ‘Environment’. (2006)

http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1239_web.pdf

World Health Organization. “Health Effects of the Chernobyl Accident and Special Health Care Programmes.” Report of the UN Chernobyl Forum Expert Group “Health”. (2006)

http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/chernobyl/WHO%20Report%20on%20Chernobyl%20Health%20Effects%20July%2006.pdf

Elki-Palki

27-10-2006, 15:14

RUDNAYA PRISTAN/DALNEGORSK, RUSSIA

Potentially affected people: 90,000

Type of pollutants: Lead, cadmium, mercury, antimony

Rudnaya Pristan Lead Smelter

Site description: Dalnegorsk and Rudnaya Pristan are two towns in the Russian Far East whose residents suffer from serious lead poisoning from an old smelter and the unsafe transport of lead concentrate from the local lead mining site. According to the most recent study, lead concentrations in residential gardens (476-4310 mg/kg, Gmean=1626 mg/kg) and in roadside soils (2020-22900 mg/kg, Gmean=4420 mg/kg) exceed USEPA guidance for remediation by orders of magnitude. These data suggest that drinking water, interior dust, and garden crops also likely contain dangerous levels of lead. Water discharged from the smelter averages 2900 m3/day with concentrations up to 100 kg of lead and 20 kg arsenic.

Limited initial testing has revealed that children's blood lead levels are 8 to 20 times the maximum allowable U.S. levels. Preliminary biokinetic estimates of mean blood levels suggest that preschool children are at significant risk of lead poisoning from soil/dust ingestion with levels predicted to average 13-27 microg/dl. Annual air emissions found 85 tons of particulate matter with lead and arsenic concentrations being 50 and 0.5 tons, respectively.

Since 1930 there has not been any attempt to address associated health concerns by either an educational or a technical environmental program. In fact, as Sharov points out, the residents of the area were simply left to deal with their health risk problems on their own and are largely unaware of the risks. Furthermore, some residents in Rudnaya use old casings of submarine batteries that were recycled by the smelter in order to collect precipitation for watering their gardens.

Uncovered Lead Transport

Cleanup Activity

The lead smelter has now been voluntarily shut down, after smith presented the owner with data on the health risks to children of lead contamination. In addition, children’s blood lead levels are being tested, and those with elevated levels are being treated with smith funding. This funding has also supported a program of education to all residents, and local education and testing through the community is ongoing. Next, a plan to remediate the worst of the contamination needs to be drawn up and implemented.

INFORMATION

M. C. Von Braun, I. H. von Lindern, N. K. Khristoforova, and et a. “Environmental lead contamination in the Rudnaya Pristan--Dalnegorsk mining and smelter district, Russian far East”. Environmental Research Section A (2002) 88, 164-173.

A. N. Kachur, V. S. Arzhanova, P. V. Yelpatyevsky, M. C. von Braun, and I.H. von Lindern. “Environmental conditions in the Rudnaya River watershed––a compilation of Soviet and post-Soviet era sampling around a lead smelter in the Russian Far East”. The Science of The Total Environment (2003) 303:1-2 171-185

P.O. Sharov, Lead Contamination of Environment in Rudnaya Pristan, Russia and associated Health Risks. Far Eastern Health Fund. Vladivostok Dalnauka, 2005.

IsaFrost

27-10-2006, 15:16

кстати, начет Дзержинска ниежгородской области. я оттуда родом, Город не спорю - бывший химический центр, но последние 10 лет основные предприятия стоят. исследование имело цель - подорвать интерес зарубежных инвесторов к некоторым регионам России. Насчет своего города скажу - если в окрестностях в лесах растут грибы рыжики и в реках водятмся раки - вряд ли это следствие ужасной экологии. исследжование заказное и большинство результатов не соответсвуют действительному положению дел

Elki-Palki

27-10-2006, 15:16

MAILUU-SUU, KYRGYZSTAN

Potentially affected people: 23,000 immediate, millions potentially

Type of pollutants: Radioactive uranium mine tailings. Gamma radiation from the dumps measures in between 100-600 micro-roentgens per hour. Heavy metals, and cyanides.

Site description: There are twenty-three tailing dumps and thirteen waste rock dumps scattered throughout Mailuu-Suu, home to a former Soviet uranium plant. From 1946-1968 the plant produced and processed more than 10,000 metric tons of uranium ore, products which were eventually used to produce the Soviet Union’s first atomic bomb. What remains now are not atomic bombs, but 1.96 million cubic meters of radioactive mining waste that threatens the entire Ferghana valley, one of the most fertile and densely populated area in Central Asia.

Due to the high rates of seismic activity in the area, millions of people in Central Asia are potentially at risk from a failure of the waste containment. Natural hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, and mudflows, all have the potential to exacerbate problems associated with the location and mismanagement of these tailing piles. It is feared that a landslide could disturb one of the dumps and either expose radioactive material within the core of the enormous waste piles or push part of them into nearby rivers. This fear that was nearly realized in May of 2002 when a huge mudslide blocked the course of the Mailuu-Suu river and threatened to submerge another waste site. In April of this year the Obschestvenny Reiting newspaper reported that about 300,000 cubic meters of material fell into the Mailuu-Suu River near the uranium mine tailings, the result of yet another landslide. Events such as these could potentially contaminate water drunk by hundreds of thousands of people in the Ferghana Valley, shared by Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan.

The poor design and management of the waste areas also allows transfer of some material from these piles to surrounding areas by runoff. Research has found some groups getting very high doses of radon probably due to use of this runoff water in agricultural practices. Risk analyses have also been conducted to assess the radioactive contamination that could occur with more natural disasters, and have found these could lead to potential large-scale environmental contamination. A 1999 study conducted by the Institute of Oncology and Radioecology showed that twice as many residents suffered from some form of cancer than in the rest of the country.

Cleanup Activity: The World Bank has begun a project for Kyrgyzstan to “minimize the exposure of humans, livestock, and riverine flora and fauna to radionuclide associated with abandoned uranium mine tailings and waste rock dumps in the Mailuu-Suu area”. The project includes uranium mining wastes isolation and protection, improvement to the national system for disaster management, preparedness and response and the establishment of real-time monitoring and warning systems, seismic stations and sensors. The total cost of the project is 11.76 million U.S. dollars, of which 6.9 million dollars will be provided by the bank's International Development Association, an institution that gives aid to the world's poorest countries.

INFORMATION

IRIN News Org. “KYRGYZSTAN: Landslide close to Mailuu-Suu uranium dump”. UN Office for the coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. (2005) April 14. http://www.irinnews.org/report.asp?ReportID=46641&SelectRegion=Asia&SelectCountry=KYRGYZSTAN

IRIN News Org. “KYRGYZSTAN: Mailuu-Suu closely monitored following recent landslide.” UN Office for the coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. (2005) May.
http://www.irinnews.org/report.asp?ReportID=46933&SelectRegion=Asia

Sarah MacGregor. “Finding a Solution for Uranium Waste in Kyrgyzstan.” OSCE. (2004) February 4. http://www.osce.org/item/181.html

Environment News Service (ENS). “Kyrgyz Republic Funded to Secure Uranium Waste Dumps” Mines and Communities Website. (2004). June 17. http://www.minesandcommunities.org/Action/press375.htm

M. Kozlova. “Worries Fester over radioactive tailings”. Asia Water Wire.

http://www.asiawaterwire.net/node/74

“Safety of Uranium Dumps in Kirghizia Calls For Attention of International Community” Pravada (2003) April 21. http://newsfromrussia.com/world/2003/04/21/46158.html

Nurlan Djenchuraev. Current Environmental issues associated with mining wastes in Kyrgyzstan. Master of science. Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy of Central European University. (1999). http://enrin.grida.no/case_studies/nucFergana/kyrgyz_12.pdf

Elki-Palki

27-10-2006, 15:17

KOLA PENINSULA, RUSSIA

Potentially affected people: 1.3 million

Type of pollutants: Radioactive and nuclear wastes

Site description: Kola Peninsula lies in far northwestern Russian Federation, between the Barents Sea and the White Sea. Administratively, it forms part of Murmansk oblast (region). The strategic importance of the peninsula led to the proliferation of military bases here during the Cold War. The major port of the region is Murmansk. During the Soviet period, Murmansk was a major submarine production center, and remains a chief naval headquarters in modern Russia. Currently there are 70 decommissioned nuclear submarines being moored in ports along the Kola Peninsula. Considered obsolete, damaged, or banned by strategic arms reductions treaties, these submarines have been largely abandoned after being stripped of their offensive armament. They are manned by skeleton crews and hold within their poorly maintained hulls a total of nearly 30 times the amount of nuclear fuel that was in Chernobyl Reactor Number Four when it exploded in 1986.

The Kola Peninsula as a whole suffered major ecological damage, mostly as a result of pollution from the military (particularly naval) production, as well as from industrial mining of apatite. There are currently about 250 nuclear reactors produced by the Soviet military on the peninsula, which are no longer in use but still generate radiation and leak radioactive waste.

Other investigations into the radiological doses in seafood surrounding the peninsula have linked the problems to nuclear weapons testing, nuclear reprocessing discharges and the Chernobyl accident.

Cleanup Activities: In 1999, the project direction shifted and became more focused as the Russian shipyard’s needs became better defined within the budgetary realities of the program. This shift inspired the creation of a Mobile Pretreatment Facility (MPF) to permit solid waste sorting, volume reduction and containerization at current storage locations on the Kola Peninsula prior to transfer to a central processing facility (CPF) for final treatment and disposal.

E Anbarasan, Rovaniemi. “Nuclear watch in the Far North”. UNESCO. http://www.unesco.org/courier/1998_11/uk/planete/txt1.htm

Review and Implementation of Technology for Solid Radioactive Waste Volume Reduction.

Govt Reports Announcements & Index (GRA&I), Issue 20, 2003

Annual rept.

Throw Weights to Metric Tons: The Radioactive Waste Problems of Russia's Northern Fleet. Govt Reports Announcements & Index (GRA&I), Issue 16, 2000

IsaFrost

27-10-2006, 15:18

Что то они закрыли доступ.
Вот список:
Full List 2006

Dzerzhinsk Factories

Type of pollutants: Chemicals and toxic byproducts from Cold War-era chemical weapons manufacturing, including Sarin, VX gas, lewisite - the poisonous effect of which is owed to its arsenic trioxide content, yperite (mustard gas), prussic acid, phosgene, dioxins and other persistent organic chemicals. Lead, from an additives manufacturer, now closed.

Site description: In Dzerzhinsk, a significant center of the Russian chemical manufacturing, the average life expectancy is 42 years for men and 47 for women. Until the end of the Cold War, the city was among Russia's principal production sites of chemical weapons. According to figures from Dzerzhinsk's environmental agency, from 1930-1998, almost 300,000 tons of chemical waste were improperly disposed of. Of this waste, around 190 separate chemicals were released into the groundwater. These chemicals have turned the water into a white sludge containing dioxins and high levels of phenol – an industrial chemical which can lead to acute poisoning and death. These levels are reportedly 17 million times the safe limit.

The city draws its drinking water from the same aquifers into which these old wastes and unused products were pumped. Now that many of these industries are no longer in operation, the local groundwater has risen, along with the water level in the canal. This rise in the canal's water level threatens to dump arsenic, mercury, lead and dioxins into the Oka river basin, a source of drinking water for the nearby city of Nizhny Novgorod.

Despite the heavy toll on the population’s health, a quarter of the city's 300,000 residents are still employed in factories that turn out toxic chemicals. According to a 2003 BBC report it is the young who are most vulnerable. In the local cemetery, there are a shocking number of graves of people below the age of 40. In 2003 it was reported that the death rate exceeded the birth rate by 2.6 times and it is easy to see why. The dioxins that get into the water as a by-product of chlorine production are reported to cause cancer even in minute doses.

Cleanup Activity: Following the support of a baseline research project in the area in 2004, smith, in cooperation with the local government, has funded the installation of water treatment systems in Pyra (population 4,000), and Gavirolvka, settlements whose groundwater is highly polluted, yet remains the sole source of drinking water. In addition, smith has funded the establishment of a steering committee led by a local NGO (DRONT) in cooperation with the Nizhniy Novgorod municipal government, to begin the design of a large-scale remediation and pollution mitigation plan for the entire affected area.

In 2004 the local government conducted an initial evaluation of the extent of the groundwater contamination in the city and reviewed subsequent engineering options to bring clean water in to Dzerzhinsk to replace use of the contaminated groundwater source in Gavrilovka and Pyra, two areas of the city

INFORMATION

* Dzerzhinsk Chemical Plant Workers Call for Better Pensions : FBIS-TAC-97-119 : 29 Apr 1997

* Russian Chemical Weapons Sites Undergo Foreign Inspection : FBIS-TAC-98-068 : 9 Mar 1998

M R. Edelstein. “EMPOWERING RUSSIAN AND AMERICAN NGOs TO ADDRESS ISSUES OF FUTURE SUSTAINABILITY” FINAL PROJECT REPORT. Ramapo College of New Jersey

(2005) http://phobos.ramapo.edu/facassem/edelsteinempoweringngos.html

“Dzerzhinksk” Global Security Organization.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/russia/dzerzhinsk_cbw.htm

Tim Samuals, “Russia’s Deadly Factories.” BBC News. March 7, 2003.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/correspondent/2821835.stm

бред! абсолютный! сейчас такой кипиш местные власти развели - и правильно!

Elki-Palki

27-10-2006, 15:18

SUMGAYIT, AZERBAIJAN

Potentially affected people: 275,000

Type of pollutants: Organic Pollutants, Oil, Heavy Metals

Site description: Sumgayit city was founded in the 1950’s as a Soviet industrial center. It is the site of 23 factories which at one time were the major production site of industrial and agricultural chemicals for the Soviet Union. These factories provided a variety of products such as chlorinated pesticides and other agricultural, industrial and domestic chemical products. Like the Soviet oil industry, these industrial chemical plants did not practice adequate environmental safeguards leaving the surrounding areas heavily contaminated. In line with growing production demands, hundreds of thousands of tons of toxic wastes were annually released into the atmosphere or dumped into a creek that feeds into the Caspian Sea. To this day untreated sewage and mercury-contaminated sludge (from chlor-alkali industries) are dumped haphazardly into the sea creating dead zones. Outdated technologies, lack of pollution controls and the disposal and treatment of accumulated waste around the industries are the major problems here. In 1992, the city of Sumgayit was declared an environmental disaster zone. A 2006 study revealed that Sumgayit residents have an increased cancer burden as a consequence of intense occupational and environmental pollution from industry.

Cleanup activities

Sumgayit Centre for environmental Rehabilitation has started an education program for contamination and dangers associated. From 2003 the World Bank has been funding the cleanup of the chlor-alkali plant where the 1,566 tons of mercury have been spilled.

J.E. Andruchow, C.L. Soskolne, F. Racioppi, et al. “Cancer Incidence and Mortality in the Industrial City of Sumgayit, Azerbaijan”. Int J. Occupational Environmental Health. (2006). 12 (3). 234-241. http://www.ijoeh.com/pfds/IJOEH_1203_Andruchow.pdf.

J. W. Bickham, C. W. Matson, A. Islamzadeh, et al. “Editorial: The unknown environmental tragedy in Sumgayit, Azerbaijan” Ecotoxicology, (2003). 12, 505-508.

“The State of environment. Azebaijan.” Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources of the Republic of Azerbaijan. http://www.eco.gov.az/v2.1/az/Azerbaijan/Eco_En.htm

Azerbaijan Country Environmental Analysis. Asian Development Bank. (2006) Jan.

http://www.asiandevbank.org/Documents/Studies/Ctry-Environmental-Analysis/2005/AZE/chap3.pdf#search=%22SUMGAYIT%20AZERBAIJAN%20remediation%202006%22

Elki-Palki

27-10-2006, 15:19

MAYAK and Lake Karachay, CHELYABINSK Russia

Potentially affected people: 50,000

Type of pollutants: Radiation

Site Description: “At one time, the most contaminated side of the small bog-like lake—just a few hundred meters across—was so “hot” that a 30-minute exposure would be fatal for 50% of humans,” reports one expert who visited the site for Environmental Health Perspectives. Lake Karachay at Chelyabinsk-65, a Russian nuclear weapon production site, contains 120 million curies of radioactivity, mostly cesium-137. In the past 45 years, about half a million people in the region have been irradiated in one or more of the incidents, exposing them to as much as 20 times the radiation suffered by the Chernobyl victims. From 1949 to 1956 members of the public were exposed via discharge of very large quantities of radioactive liquid wastes into the Techa River. Then, in 1957 further exposure came as the result of an explosion in the radioactive waste storage, coupled with numerous gaseous aerosol releases occurring within the first decades of the facility's operation. Residents of many villages downstream on the Techa River were exposed via a variety of pathways; the more significant included drinking of water from the river and external gamma exposure due to proximity to sediments and shoreline.

The Mayak weapons manufacturing complex had been using Lake Karachay as a dumping basin for its high level radioactive waste since 1951. In 1967, a drought reduced the water level of the lake, and gale-force winds spread the radioactive dust throughout twenty-five thousand square kilometers, further irradiating 436,000 people with five million curies, approximately the same as at Hiroshima. Russian doctors who study radiation sickness in the area estimate that those living along the Techa River received an average of four times more radiation than the Chernobyl victims. The river is the only source of water for the 24 villages which lined its banks. The four largest of those villages were never evacuated, and only recently have the authorities revealed to the population why they strung barbed wire along the banks of the river some 35 years ago.

Clean-up activities

Access to Lake Karachay has been cut off and the area isolated, to limit the risk to people.

Slawomir Grunberg. “Chelyabinsk The most contaminated spot on the planet”. Documentary Film by LogIN Productions. http://www.logtv.com/chelya/default.html

“Chelyabinsk-65/ Ozersk Combine 817/Production Association Mayak” Global Security.org.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/russia/chelyabinsk-65_nuc.htm

R. Clay. “Cold War Hot Nukes Legacy of an Era”. Environmental Health Perspectives. (2001) April. 109 (4) A162-A169. http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2001/109-4/focus.pdf#search=%22MAYAK%20and%20Lake%20Karachay%20environmental%20health%22

L. Skpperud, B. Salbu, D. H. Oughton, E. Drozcho, et al. “Plutonium contamination in soils and sediments at Mayak PA, Russia”. Health Physics. (2005) 89 (3) 255-266.

MO Degteva, MI Vorobiova, VP Kozheurov, et al. “Dose reconstruction system for the exposed population living along the Techa River”. Health Physics. (2000) 78 (5) 542-554.

Elki-Palki

27-10-2006, 15:19

KOMI, RUSSIA

Potentially affected people: 46,000

Type of pollutants: Benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, xylene and other petroleum related chemicals

Site description: The oil spill near the town of Usinsk in Northern Russia (Komi republic) is one of the most serious environmental disasters of the decade. The pipeline just south of the Arctic Circle had been leaking since February 1994 but the oil was contained within a dike built for this purpose. On October 1 of that year the dike collapsed because of cold and snow. Following the collapse, around 102,000 tons of oil began to pour onto the Siberian tundra. The spill reached the Kolva River, a tributary of the Pechora River, which falls into the Barents Sea. Life within the rivers as well as the fragile environment of the Artic have been seriously endangered by this oil spill. Experts estimate the spill to be eight times greater than the Exxon Valdez oil spill. The ruptured pipeline is the third largest oil spill in history. Along the oil pipelines, which experience hundreds of leaks and breakages each year, the ground is saturated with oil. Some of the oil has already seeped into the water table. The oil spread across 170 acres of streams and fragile bogs and marshland.

Local villagers have suffered for years from the effects of the petroleum pollution from the many oil spills in the region. Most natives are worried about the fish living in the Kolva River. Exclaimed one resident, "The river used to have lots of fish, now there are hardly any at all and when we cook them they smell bad...people here survive but they are worried about the future".

Cleanup Activities: The Russian government has assumed responsibility for the cleanup of this oil spill. The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development has lent the clean-up operation $25 million and the World Bank has provided $100 million. A US-Australian joint venture (AES/Hartec) was also hired to clean up the spill. Lake Schuchye was heavily polluted, but reductions with flotation technology reduced the hydrocarbons from 53,3 g/kg to 2.2 g/kg, removing 157 tons of crude oil.

”The Russian Arctic Oil Spill”. Trade and Environment Database (TED). (1997) Jan. 11.

http://www.american.edu/ted/komi.htm

A. V. Yablokov. “Environmental Problems in North-West Russia”. International Network of Engineers and Scientists against proliferation (inesap). (1997) August.

http://www.inesap.org/bulletin15/bul15art09.htm

S. V. Lushnikov, Y. A. Frank, and D. S. Vorobyov. “Oil decontamination of bottom sediments experimental work results”. Earth Sciences Research journal. (2006). 10 (1): 35-40.

Elki-Palki

27-10-2006, 15:20

VOLGOGRAD, RUSSIA

Potentially affected people: More than 1 million

Type of pollutants: SO2, sulfates, CO, NOx, phenol, particulates, HCl, ammonia, formaldehyde, magnesium, chlorides, phosphorus, copper, zinc, fluorides, oil products, organic pollutants, benzene, benzapyrene, chlorobenzene, cadmium, hydrocarbon tetrachloride, chloroform, hexavalent chromium, formaldehyde, nickel, vinyl chloride, polyvinyl chloride dust, benzapyrene sorbed on soot

Site description: Volgograd is a large industrial city situated on the Volga River. Active industries including oil refining, chemicals manufacturing, non-ferrous and ferrous metallurgies, coupled with pollution from transportation has rendered the air and water extremely polluted. Volgograd obtains its drinking water supplies from the Volga, which needs to be treated in order to meet health standards.

Motor vehicle exhaust accounts for 38% of all emissions, and are a major cause of environmental damage. Industrial production activities result in emissions of more than 1 million tons of toxic wastes into the atmosphere, only 18% of which are recovered and neutralized. Authorized dumps and waste disposal sites occupy 5200 hectares of land. Effluent discharge into small water bodies totals 268 million m3, including 51.6 million m3 of untreated, polluted water. Seventy-three companies with 114 on-site water outlets where scientific investigations are carried out are currently being monitored, as are the Volga and Don rivers. Damaged land covers an area of 2800 hectares. According to medical statistics for 1993-1995, more than 6 thousand cases of malignant tumors were registered in Volgograd annually.

Cleanup Activity: In mid-1993, Volgograd was chosen as the test site for the initial phase of a four-year Russia Air Management Program (RAMP). Operating from 1995 to 1998, the project aimed to test new methods of air quality management techniques and policies. The results of the program were then circulated throughout the Russian Federation. The program was managed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in conjunction with the Institute for Sustainable Communities (ISC) and other Russian organizations.

The program created the Center for Environmental Training (CET), which promoted citizen participation through the education of NGOs, business and government leaders. Opening in October 1995, the CET continues to provide training to these various sectors of the Russian Federation.

“Description of ISC projects in Russia.” Institute for Sustainable Communities. (2006)

http://www.iscvt.org/programs/psrussia.html

“Volgograd Region” Kommersant: Russia’s Daily Online. (2004) March 8.

http://www.kommersant.com/page.asp?idr=422&id=-78

“Shedding light on skin cancer” Environmental health perspectives. (1994). 102 (2).

http://www.ehponline.org/docs/1994/102-2/forum.html

MAGNITOGORSK, RUSSIA

Potentially affected people: 460,000

Type of pollutants: Lead, Sulfur dioxide, Heavy metals and air pollutants

Site description: In an area where it is rumoured unusual to give birth to a healthy baby, the local hospital estimates that only 1% of all children in Magnitogorsk are in good health. Magnitogorsk, located in Western Russia, lies on the banks of the Ural River. In the 1930's one of the largest Russian iron and steel works was established here that produced steel for half the Russian tanks during WW II. At optimum capacity it can produce up to 7.5 million tons of steel. The industry used to belch out 650,000 tons of industrial wastes, including 68 toxic chemicals, and polluted some 4,000 square miles of Russia. According to a steelworker, none of the filtering devices were in working condition. The highly increased cancer rates in the city are attributed to severe pollution from dioxides and benzopyrene. According to Nezavisimaya Gazeta, only 28% of infants born in 1992 were healthy, and only 27% had healthy mothers.

Cleanup Activity: in 2004 smith Institute’s Technical Advisory Board reviewed the Magnitogorsk case. In 2005 the site was visited by smith Institute, which intends to fund health studies and plans to work with the plant to further reduce its pollution levels.

P. Green. “Breathing sulfur and eating lead: Magnitogorsk’s children need oxygen cocktails.” U.S. News & World Report. (1992) April 13.

http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1:12103833/Breathing+sulfur+and+eating+lead%7eC%7e+Magnitogorsks+children+need+oxygen+cocktails%7eR%7e+(includes+related+article%7eR%7e%7eR%7e%7eR%7e.html?refid=ency_botnm

smith Institute Polluted Places.

http://www.pollutedplaces.org/region/e_europe/russia/magnito.shtml

Elki-Palki

27-10-2006, 15:27

исследжование заказное и большинство результатов не соответсвуют действительному положению дел
Но несмотря на прекрасную природу этого края мужчины там в среднем живут 42 года. Наверно, все она, проклятая! Горькая!!! Или от того, что водопроводной водой запивают?

А вот, что они написали, что бы в США не инвестировли!!!!
Смешная ты Ися, потеха да и только!!!!

NEW ORLEANS, UNITED STATES

Potentially affected people: 500,000

Type of pollutants: Chemicals, petroleum residuals, VOCs, heavy metals such as lead, cadmium and nickel, diesel range organics, benzo(a)pyrene

Site Description: Since the levee breach in the Lower Ninth Ward, and subsequent flooding of the city, New Orleans now poses substantial health risks to those returning to the city. Thirty-seven percent of more than 200 samples taken in Orleans Parish exceed the Louisiana state cleanup level for soil in residential neighborhoods. There are seven locations in residential neighborhoods of Mid-City, Gentilly, Lakeview and New Orleans East where arsenic levels are more than 100 times higher than the EPA soil safety guideline and as much as 6.5 times higher than the Louisiana cleanup and investigation level. More than half of the samples collected in several neighborhoods, and more than 25 percent of the samples collected across the New Orleans area, likely meet the EPA's definition of a hazardous waste. NRDC's analysis identified "hot spots" of lead contamination at levels as much as three times higher than the Louisiana soil cleanup and investigation level in Gentilly, Bywater, Mid-City and the Lower Ninth Ward. As much as 91 percent of the EPA samples were found to contain significant amounts of diesel fuel ingredients. In fact, every EPA sample from the districts of Uptown/Carrollton and Central City/Garden exceeds the state cleanup and investigation standard for diesel contamination, as do more than 90 percent of the samples from Mid-City, Gentilly, Bywater, New Orleans East, and Arabi in St. Bernard Parish. NRDC also identified eight hot spots where levels of diesel-range organics are more than 100 times higher than the LDEQ soil cleanup and investigation standard for residential neighborhoods.

The analysis also found high levels of benzo(a)pyrene, one of the most toxic compounds in soot and petroleum products. Benzo(a)pyrene levels exceed Louisiana cleanup and investigation standards in 57 percent of the samples in Orleans Parish. In general, the neighborhoods with high levels of diesel fuel contamination also have higher levels of benzo(a)pyrene contamination. In New Orleans' Bywater neighborhood, where the Agricultural Street Landfill Superfund Site is located, the average level of this contaminant is more than 18 times higher than the applicable LDEQ cleanup and investigation standard, while the peak level is more than 50 times higher than the state soil cleanup level.

This conclusion is based on thresholds for acute exposures, typically experienced by emergency responders who are expected to interact with the contaminated area for limited duration. To date, the EPA has not assessed sediment-sampling data using long-term residential standards. These latter standards reflect long-term exposure typical to a family residing at the contaminated property. Consequently, contamination levels that are acceptable for short-term exposure by emergency responders are not necessarily at safe levels for habitability. As such, it can be surmised that current soil contamination levels surpass healthy levels for residency throughout the flood zone. Current contamination levels present an even higher risk to children, elderly, and other health-sensitive individuals.

Cleanup Activities

Beyond sediment sampling, neither EPA nor the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) has conducted any soil remediation nor outlined a process by which this is to occur. Furthermore, no literature or guidance has been provided to residential or commercial property owners concerning soil contamination and options for property assessment and remediation. Lastly, no clearly defined procedures exist whereby property owners can report additional evidence of contamination nor request additional monitoring or information on options for assessment and remediation. Jeffrey Thomas, on behalf of the BNOB City Planning Committee, has identified three leading environmental health issues that must be addressed within the Master City Plan. They include monitoring, remediation, and redevelopment of soil contaminated properties, of mold generated by Hurricane Katrina flooding, and of Pre-Katrina contaminated properties, including superfund sites, brownfields, and other active or abandoned locations.

IsaFrost

27-10-2006, 15:34

[QUOTE=Elki-Palki]Но несмотря на прекрасную природу этого края мужчины там в среднем живут 42 года. Наверно, все она, проклятая! Горькая!!! Или от того, что водопроводной водой запивают?

А вот, что они написали, что бы в США не инвестировли!!!!
Смешная ты Ися, потеха да и только!!!!

Елкин, извини меня - но это бред! Я 2 года назад писала статью об экологической обстановке и разговаривала с господином Прозоровым - который кстати якобы и давал данные для этого исследования. 42 для мужчин и 47 для женщин - эти более чем лживые данные! Не было такого никогда! даже для сотрудников химических предприятий! даже в 50-е годы - когда вредные цеха работали на полную! Есчли по зрарязнениям им могли впарить лданные 50-60-х годов, то по продолжительности жизни - не более чем вымысел! Я жила там, блин!

IsaFrost

27-10-2006, 15:38

[QUOTE=Elki-Palki]Но несмотря на прекрасную природу этого края мужчины там в среднем живут 42 года. Наверно, все она, проклятая! Горькая!!! Или от того, что водопроводной водой запивают?

А вот, что они написали, что бы в США не инвестировли!!!!
Смешная ты Ися, потеха да и только!!!!

Поселок Пыра - от жутко вредного цеха завода им Свердлова - 12 км. На саомй пыре цех по производству посуды. В 8 км от Пыры - реликтовое Пырское озеро ледникового происхождения!
я не патриотка - но читать эту ХУЙНЮ - извините меня модераторы - сил нет!

водозабор находится в 20 км выше по реке Оке от промышленной зоны - как интересно туда отходы попадают?

Elki-Palki

27-10-2006, 16:09

Ты как то это в свой адрес воспринимаешь.
Зря.
Надеюсь в результате этого шума о проблемах в Дзержинске будут говорить и сделают нормальную независимую экологическую эксперитзу.

Вот я какую статью нашел про Дзержинск.
http://www.tvc.ru/center/index/id/70402007890000-2006-10-25.html

"В карстовом провале хранятся отходы производства завода «Оргстекло». Еще один полигон отходов химического производства с не менее колоритным названием «Белое море» – это 2 миллиона кубометров диоксинов, хлора и других вредных веществ. Рядом с промзоной расположено несколько поселков. Жители остро ощущают присутствие химии.

- Испарения от «Белого моря» идут. Я хожу за молоком к «Белому морю». Идешь - туман...

Дмитрий Левашов, независимый эколог: «Летом воды не хватает, люди пользуются грунтовыми водами. Содержание фенола превышает предельно допустимую концентрацию в 300 раз».

Хранилища отходов – это наследие советских времен. Дзержинск был одним из основных центров производства химического оружия в СССР. В период с 30-го по 98-й год утилизировали около 300 тонн отходов.

Павел Усатюк, начальник Дзержинского городского отдела по экологическому контролю: «Город был закрыт, здесь была масса химических производств, в том числе по производству боевых отравляющих веществ».

Каждое утро специалисты лаборатории по мониторингу загрязнения окружающей среды Гидрометцентра совершают обход: берут пробы на анализы. За последние 8 месяцев состояние воздуха только ухудшилось.

Светлана Матвеева, начальник лаборатории по мониторингу загрязнения окружающей среды: «Второй пост находится на территории больницы. Там повышения по аммиаку. Часто превышение по фенолу, диоксиду азота».

Один из постов, с помощью которого исследовали состояние воздуха в восточной промзоне города, сейчас закрыт. На его содержание нет денег. Это значит, что специалисты лишены возможности контролировать территорию, где сосредоточены промышленные предприятия. А именно оттуда с воздушными потоками в город попадают все вредные вещества.

Асхат Каюмов, независимый эколог: «Вот заключение. Заболеваемость дзержинцев выше средних показателей по органам дыхания, сердечно-сосудистым заболеваниям».

В администрации города нападки со стороны независимых экологов называют провокацией. По данным, которыми обладает мэрия, Дзержинск не входит в десятку наиболее загрязненных городов России. Любую другую информацию распространяют конкуренты предприятий, расположенных на территории города, утверждают представители власти.

Виктор Портнов, мэр Дзержинска: «Последний экологический аудит был проведен в Дзержинске в 2000 году. С тех пор новых серьезных исследований никто не проводил. Программа по улучшению экологической обстановки в городе отсутствует».

Где правда, а где ложь? Ответ на этот вопрос интересует, прежде всего, рядовых жителей Дзержинска. Чтобы разобраться в ситуации, правительство области намерено в ближайшее время организовать масштабные исследования экологической ситуации в городе. "

IsaFrost

27-10-2006, 16:27

была я летом у этого шламоприемника - не спорю, пованивает! Но - вокруг зелено, только в радиусе может 50-ти метров конечно страшненько! не спорю - в отношении экологии город не самый благонадежный, но чтобы 2-й в мире? С чем сравнивать?
Усатюк на своем посту всего полгода - недавно выступал по метному ТВ и говорил о неверности представленных в отчете данных. основные загрязнения как раз в центре города и виной тому всего лишь выхлопные газы (а каак интересно в москве?)
Видишь ли - если взять 10 городов и сравнивать их - то 2-й из десятки - не значит самый грязный в мире!

И давай прекратим - вы типа тут все в чистой финляндии живеие - а мы мутанты в грязно вонючей России! так не буду же я срать где живу, потому и защищаю!

MihaNik

27-10-2006, 17:44

А че кататься и так все известно. Охотники за цветметом конечно внесли свою лепту в борьбе за экологию. Но на общую картину это мало повлияло :)

сьезди в штаты ,в трущебы гетто , там еще похлещще будет . видимо невсе известно и покататся надо,а то общая картина будет уже необщая .

Arrogant

27-10-2006, 18:05

Arrogant

27-10-2006, 18:09

сьезди в штаты ,в трущебы гетто , там еще похлещще будет . видимо невсе известно и покататся надо,а то общая картина будет уже необщая .

То есть экология в трущобах не очень? Стронций там и фенол?
Сам то ездил "в штаты, в трущебы гетто"?
Ха-ха-ха....

MihaNik

27-10-2006, 18:25

То есть экология в трущобах не очень? Стронций там и фенол?
Сам то ездил "в штаты, в трущебы гетто"?
Ха-ха-ха....

ездил и грязи там дохера,а тыто ездил? эколог доморощенный ? ))))

MihaNik

27-10-2006, 18:33

[QUOTE=Elki-Palki]Международная Организация Blacsmith Institute опубликовала список самых экологически загрязненых мест на планете.
http://www.smithinstitute.org/top10/top10map3.jpg
Страны бывшего СССР заняли много почетных мест в этом списке:
CHERNOBYL, UKRAINE
DZERZINSK, RUSSIA
KOLA PENINSULA, RUSSIA
KOMI, RUSSIA
MAGNITOGORSK, RUSSIA
MAILUU-SUU, KYRGYZSTAN
MAYAK and Lake Karachay, CHELYABINSK Russia
NORILSK, RUSSIA
RUDNAYA PRISTAN/DALNEGORSK, RUSSIA
SUMGAYIT, AZERBAIJAN
VOLGOGRAD, RUSSIA
QUOTE]

Чудовищно, что в России упомянуты целые регионы. Дело даже не в количестве людей, подверженных вредному воздействию а в том, что на огромных территориях изувечена необратимо природа.

да кудауж ,люди это неважно ,главное природа ...))
в карелии например увечат природу ,и порой необратимо финны ,под сонным оком правительства карелии ,косящие лес как траву .недавно в дереню приезжал где у нас домик был ,вокруг болота ,где раньше были густые леса ,на границе идет нескончаемаю вереницца вагонов и фур груженых доверху первосортной древесиной .
СПРОС рождает предложение ,именно спрос . тоже самое и по поводу праституции в сортавале .

Giomen

27-10-2006, 20:58

сьезди в штаты ,в трущебы гетто , там еще похлещще будет . видимо невсе известно и покататся надо,а то общая картина будет уже необщая .

Города... Везде одинаково ужасно, но это тема отдельного обсуждения. А вот тысячи гектаров НЕЖИВОЙ земли с лунным ландшафтов или разщбросанным мусор непонятного, тоже наверное неземного, происхождения впечатляют! Уверен и в Штатох таких районов активной жизнидеятельности достаточно. Но там их хоть приводят в порядок несколько иными способами в отличии от закапывания в землю, выбрасывания в море, или же как говорит уважаемая IsaFrost просто положением на все некоторого органа.

Arrogant

28-10-2006, 00:35

да кудауж ,люди это неважно ,главное природа ...))
в карелии например увечат природу ,и порой необратимо финны ,под сонным оком правительства карелии ,косящие лес как траву .недавно в дереню приезжал где у нас домик был ,вокруг болота ,где раньше были густые леса ,на границе идет нескончаемаю вереницца вагонов и фур груженых доверху первосортной древесиной .
СПРОС рождает предложение ,именно спрос . тоже самое и по поводу праституции в сортавале .

Природу России изувечили иностранцы, иначе просто быть не может. Правительство с сонным оком заброшено в Карелию ими же. Иностранцы кроме того научили селянок и селян заниматься "этим" за деньги, а не просто так ( обидно).

MihaNik

28-10-2006, 00:50

Природу России изувечили иностранцы, иначе просто быть не может. Правительство с сонным оком заброшено в Карелию ими же. Иностранцы кроме того научили селянок и селян заниматься "этим" за деньги, а не просто так ( обидно).

идиот ,зачем в карелию забрасывать карельское правительство ,в карелии есть местное самоуправление и его глава )))

да нет конечно ,это все путин и его кровавая гебня устроили ))) а иностранцы приезжают изключительно сажать деревья и востанавливать природу .

Arrogant

28-10-2006, 01:00

идиот ,зачем в карелию забрасывать карельское правительство ,в карелии есть местное самоуправление и его глава )))

да нет конечно ,это все путин и его кровавая гебня устроили ))) а иностранцы приезжают изключительно сажать деревья и востанавливать природу .

Насчет заброски карельского правительства извне - это была метафора, аллегория.Понял? Нет?...Трудные слова?

Для тебя поясню на понятном языке - прикол это был такой - в продолжение твоей "мысли".
Так что, не я идиот.......

finnik

28-10-2006, 01:06

Странно... А где же в списке "экологические убийцы" финны..?
http://www.russian.fi/forum/showthread.php?t=26716

MihaNik

28-10-2006, 01:10

Понял? Нет?...Трудные слова?

это ты сам ссобой разговаривал сейчас?
)

Для тебя поясню на понятном языке - прикол это был такой - в продолжение твоей "мысли".
Так что, не я идиот.......
если ты не идиот ,то почему на понятном языке поясняеш только мне ? ))
ты непродолжил мою мысль а перевернул ,в этом приколто ? я те конкретные факты а ты мне идиотскую иронию с закосом под остроумие ... )нечего конкретно по теме сказать ? молчи в тряпку ,10 раз повторял НА ПОНЯТНОМ ЯЗЫКЕ,такчто насчет идиота я неошибся

Wellwalker

28-10-2006, 01:15

Но там их хоть приводят в порядок несколько иными способами в отличии от закапывания в землю, выбрасывания в море, или же как говорит уважаемая IsaFrost просто положением на все некоторого органа.

Если они и перестали это делать, то недавно. Шведы с финами бодро выбрасывали ртуть и токсичные отходы в Балтийское море. Сейчас не знают, что делать - поднимать опасно.

finnik

28-10-2006, 01:17

кстати, начет Дзержинска ниежгородской области... в окрестностях в лесах растут грибы рыжики и в реках водятмся раки ...
Помню там какой-то комбикормовый заводик... Один день даже работал там... ;)
Один раз на станции уголь разгружал... Ещё полигон от неразорвавшихся мин и снарядов очищал... Лес там сосновый, как в Финляндии... И дикое колличество огромных крокусов, прямо в лесу... Красотищщааа! :inlove:

MihaNik

28-10-2006, 01:27

Помню там какой-то комбикормовый заводик... Один день даже работал там... ;)
Один раз на станции уголь разгружал... Ещё полигон от неразорвавшихся мин и снарядов очищал... Лес там сосновый, как в Финляндии... И дикое колличество огромных крокусов, прямо в лесу... Красотищщааа! :inlove:

не так страшен черт как его малюют ...айт?

Wellwalker

28-10-2006, 01:36

Что то они закрыли доступ.
Вот список:
Full List 2006

Странное какое-то дело со списками. Твой отличается от того, который у нижегородцев, причем очень сильно. Сами составители списка свой больше никому не показывают. Я не, спорю, если там химия, то в городе наверняка плохо с экологией. Только осадочек какой-то остается от суеты этой. Могут и действительно привирать, вон и говорят "ожидаемая продолжительность жизни в Дзержинске близка к общероссийским показателям и составляет 64 года" http://www.nr2.ru/88515.html/print/
А если судить по могилам, то самый плохой, с точки зрения экологии, город - это Тольятти.
Посмотрим чего там Шанцев наисследует