|
"Выдайка определение "имперских замашек", а мы поговорим, есть они у России или нет"
а ДО этого, зубер писал: - "Мечтать о повторении 1939 года, дабы доказать, что Россия имеет имперские замашки просто глупо." Ну уж не я термин первым употребил... Логически мысля ИМперия не может не иметь "имперских замашек", не так ли? Честно говоря не очень то хочется обсуждать такую очевидную вещь. Но уж если так интересно то:
Imperialism is a policy of extending the control or authority over foreign entities as a means of acquisition and/or maintenance of empires, either through direct territorial or through indirect methods of exerting control on the politics and/or economy of other countries. The term is used by some to describe the policy of a country in maintaining colonies and dominance over distant lands, regardless of whether the country calls itself an empire.
An empire (also known technically, abstractly or disparagingly as an imperium, and with powers known among Romans as "imperium") comprises a set of regions locally ruled by governors, viceroys or client kings in the name of an emperor. By extension, one could classify as an empire any large, multi-ethnic state ruled from a single center. Like other states, an empire maintains its political structure at least partly by coercion. Land-based empires (such as Russia or Achaemenid Persia) tend to extend in a contiguous area; sea-borne empires, also known as thalassocracies (the Athenian and British empires provide examples), may feature looser structures and more scattered territories.
"Имперские замашки" тоже самое "имперские амбиции" - imperial аmbitions. Теперь надеюсь тепе определение своего же термина, который ты уже употреблял понятно.
|
