Просмотр одиночного сообщения
Old 06-06-2006, 21:52   #103
sas
Registered User
 
Сообщений: 222
Проживание:
Регистрация: 21-02-2006
Status: Offline
От нечего делать решил опубликовать письмо, отправленное в консульство и в Министерство в марте месяце. По понятным причинам, часть информации скрыта.

=================================== =====================
Dear Consul,

ХХХХХХХХ is one of the many subsidiaries of the ХХХХХХ concern with its headquarters in ХХХХХХХ, Germany. ХХХХХ develops and produces high-tech products in the fields money printing, cards for payment systems and security solutions, supplying central and commercial banks. Obviously, the reliability and trustworthiness of each individual employee is of the utmost importance to a company like ХХХХХХ since personnel have access not only to confidential customer data, but are also in contact with representatives of central and commercial banks from all over the world.

On Feb. 20th 2006 my visa application of Feb. 3rd 2006 for a 30 day “C” visa for multiple stays was, for the first time in my travelling history, refused. Also, my right to re-application was denied until June 2006, with reference to chapter 23 of the alien registration law. It seems to me that such a decision should be taken on the basis of sound reasons, especially if the applicant concerned has over the past 10 years repeatedly been in possession of Finish, German, British, and Dutch visas, and holds no violation record as described in chapter III, 2 of the common consulary instructions to diplomatic missions and consulary departments.
With no intention to infringe on the rights of any country, I do approach you with the following request: Since the decision taken by you consulate plays an important role also for any application submitted to another Schengen member state as well as for other countries enquiring about the applicant’s visa history, and since my trustworthiness is of vital importance to my employer, I would like to kindly ask you to check whether your consulate’s decision could have been based on incorrect data. Alternatively, I would appreacite to be informed on the reasons for rejecting my visa application, since I am not aware of having in any way violated during my preivious visits European Union, Finish or Russian law. In view of this, I do not exclude that the negative decision could be based on a mix-up of application data, expecially as according to the stamp in my passport does not refer to the type of visa I had applied for, but instead states the refusal of a “C” visa with single entry (Decision of the exucutive comitee of 23/06/98 on the stamping of
> passports of the visa APLICANTS).
>
> My data are as follows
> ХХХХХХХХХХ
> ХХХХХХХХХХ
> Previous visas
> FIN ХХХХХХ issued on ХХХХХX
> FIN ХХХХХХ issued on ХХХХХX
> UK ХХХХХХ issued on ХХХХХX
> EST ХХХХХХ issued on ХХХХХX
> FIN ХХХХХХ issued on XXXXXX
> D XXXXXXX issued on XXXXXX
> D XXXXXXX issued on XXXXXX
> BNLXXXXXX issued on XXXXXX
> etc.
>
> Yours faithfully

=================================== ===================
 
0
 
0
    Ответить с цитированием